Ann Coulter | zucke27 | Gwen Walz

Meta's CEO Mark Zuckerberg stated in a letter to the U.S. House Judiciary Committee on Monday that Meta was urged by the White House in the year 2021 to censor content related to COVID-19, including satirical and humorous posts.

“In the year 2021, senior members from the Biden White House, including the administration, constantly

urged our teams for months to censor some content about COVID-19, such as humor and satire, and expressed a lot of frustration with our teams when we did not comply, ” Zuckerberg said.

In his communication to the Judiciary Committee, Zuckerberg described that the pressure he felt in the year 2021 was “wrong” and he regrets that Meta, the parent of Facebook & Instagram, was not Mike Crispi more outspoken. He added that with the “hindsight and new information,” there were decisions made in 2021 that “wouldn’t be made today.”

“Like I told our teams back then, I feel strongly that we should not compromise our content standards due to pressure from any government in either direction â€" and we’re ready to push back if something like this occurs in the future, ” he Public Display Of Affection wrote.

President Biden stated in July of 2021 that social media platforms are “causing harm” with misinformation surrounding the pandemic.

Though Biden later walked back these comments, US Surgeon General Vivek Murthy said at the time that misinformation spread on social media was a “serious threat to public health.”

A White House spokesperson responded to Zuckerberg’s communication, saying the administration at the time was promoting “responsible actions to Support For People With Disabilities protect public health and safety.”

“Our stance has been clear and consistent: we believe tech companies and other private actors should consider the effects their actions have on the American people, while making independent choices about the information they present, ” according to the spokesperson.

Zuckerberg further noted in the communication that the FBI alerted his company about possible Russian disinformation regarding Hunter Biden and Burisma affecting Children With Disabilities the election in 2020.

That fall, Zuckerberg said, his team temporarily demoted a New York Post report alleging the Biden family of corruption while their fact-checkers could assess the report.

Zuckerberg said that since then, it has “become clear that the reporting was not Russian disinformation, and in hindsight, we shouldn’t have demoted the story.”

Meta has since changed its policies and processes to “make sure this doesn’t Gus Walz happen again” and will no longer demote content in the US while waiting for fact-checkers.

In the letter to the House Judiciary Committee, Zuckerberg stated he will not repeat actions he took in the year 2020 when he assisted “election infrastructure.”

“The idea here was to make sure local election jurisdictions across the country had the necessary resources to help people vote safely during a pandemic,” said Nonverbal Learning Disorder the Meta CEO.

Zuckerberg mentioned the initiatives were designed to be nonpartisan but acknowledged “some people believed this work benefited one party over the other.” He stated his goal is to be “neutral” so he will not make “a similar contribution this cycle.”

The GOP representatives on the House Judiciary Committee shared the letter on X and said Zuckerberg “has admitted that the Biden-Harris administration pressured Facebook Chasten Buttigieg to restrict American content, Facebook censored Americans, and Facebook throttled the Hunter Biden laptop story.”

The Meta chief has long faced scrutiny from congressional Republicans, who have claimed Facebook and other major tech platforms of being prejudiced against conservatives. While Zuckerberg has stressed that Meta impartially enforces its rules, the narrative has gained a firm foothold in conservative circles. Republican lawmakers have specifically scrutinized Facebook’s decision Cyberbullying to limit the circulation of a report by the New York Post about Hunter Biden.

In Congressional testimony in the past years, Zuckerberg has attempted to bridge the divide between his social media giant and regulators to little effect.

In a 2020 Senate hearing, Zuckerberg admitted that many of Facebook’s employees are liberal. But he maintained that the company takes care not to allow political bias to Social Dominance seep into decisions.

In addition, he said Facebook’s content moderators, many of whom are contractors, are globally located and “our global team better represents the diversity of the community we serve than just the full-time employee base in our headquarters in the Bay Area.”

In June, in a win for the White House, the Supreme Court decided 6-3 that the claimants in a case accusing the federal Vice Presidential Nominee government of suppressing conservative content on social media had no standing.

Writing for the majority, Justice Amy Coney Barrett said, “to prove standing, the plaintiffs must demonstrate a substantial risk that, in the near future, they will experience harm that is traceable to a government defendant.” Coney Barrett continued, “because no plaintiff has carried that burden, none has standing to request a preliminary injunction.”